MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B58
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 23:18
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 95.7 1-Core 134 2-Core 247 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 482 55% 430 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,228 Write 1,733 Mixed 1,446 400% 1,802 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 66.3 217% 75.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1011 DQ Write 713 DQ Mixed 940 681% 888 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 306 304 233 166 147 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 468 Mixed 393 SusWrite 255 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 49.7 166% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 74GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 117 58 77 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 488 Write 412 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 124 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 22.6 74% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 325GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 98 90 89 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 93 Mixed 56 SusWrite 94.9 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171 37,802 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 27.3 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,274x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	302x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	132x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	302x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	187x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	135x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	94x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	85x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	84x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	62x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $1,006

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16