Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '19 at 00:38
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 122 58% 91.9 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 314 33% 264 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E181) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.4% Terrible	Lighting 7.13 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 5.81 6% 6.64 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 5.7 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.4% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 60 67 70 79 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37% Below average	Read 154 Write 113 Mixed 102 SusWrite 67.3 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 21.3 80% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 28.8 27% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 89%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 112GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 62 67 70 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 122 Write 113 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 70 69% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 88%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 511GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 84 84 83 81 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 154 Write 119 Mixed 74 SusWrite 81.7 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 100%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 5TB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 398GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8 7.9 7.9 8 8.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 28.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 7.9 17% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 87%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 129GB free Firmware: 1405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.7 7.9 8.1 7.9 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 31 Write 31.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 7.9 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 222% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 93%
Maxell External USB 3.0 4TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 246GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 170 170 168 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 156 Write 126 Mixed 81 SusWrite 169 177% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 67%
Maxell External USB 3.0 4TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 28.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 7.7 30% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 67%
Maxell External USB 3.0 4TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 709GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 28.7 Mixed 26 SusWrite 7.7 30% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 67%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 109GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 18.5 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 7.7 25% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 16.4 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	589x
Core i7 930Intel $145Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	148x
Core i7-950Intel $84Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	52x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	226x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	126x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	104x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $315

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370