PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 16.4 GB free of 20.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 23 '19 at 20:57 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 793 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95
|
2.47%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 73 89 118 119 119 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
247GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 66 81 108 107 108 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
ADATA HD650 2TB
973GB free, PID a35a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 15 19 25 25 24 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic- SD/MMC/MS/MSPRO 64GB
17GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 12 16 16 16 MB/s
|
8.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
43.8%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 586x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 553x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 504x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 283x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 162x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 140x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 139x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $255 |