Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz 131 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 40.2 1-Core 25 2-Core 50.1 25% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 93.7 8-Core 138 14% 116 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC 5/i 159GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 68 74 73 74 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 460 Write 37.5 Mixed 556 SusWrite 68.9 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 39.5 136% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 119 90% 119 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 88%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 0109 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5 5 5 5 5 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	5.33% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 5.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 5 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.33% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston 2x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM 667 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	9.92% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.92% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53101stBench 33%, 54 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 442 samples	1x

GPU
RX 560AMD $500Bench 22%, 60,738 samples	3x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	1x

SSD
PERC 5/i 239GBDellBench 26%, 5 samples	3x

RAM
M395T5160CZ4-CE65 80CE808980CE M395T5160CZ4-CE65 80CE808980CE M395T5166AZ4-CE65 80CE808980CE M395T5160CZ4-CE65 80CE808980CE M395T5160QZ4-CE65 80CE7FB380CE M395T5160FB4-CE68 80CE808980CE M395T5160CZ4-CE65 80CE808980CE M395T5160C... 32GBUnknownBench 13%, 4 samples	3x
HYMP151F72CP4N3-Y5 8x4GBUnknownBench 17%, 31 samples	1x
M395T5160QZ4-CE66 80CE808980CE M395T5160CZ4-CE65 80CE7FB380CE M395T5160QZ4-CE66 80CE808980CE M395T5160CZ4-CE65 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750GZ4-CE66 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750GZ4-CE66 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750GZ4-CE66 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750G... 24GBUnknownBench 19%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 10% - Very poor

Total price: $500