Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141007
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 429
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1170 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 41% Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 503ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 96 106 97 107 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.9% Above average
Read 122
Write 178
Mixed 149
SusWrite 103
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 35.2
124% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 101
100% 160 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
201GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 87.3
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
616GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 64.7
Write 67.2
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 103
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 18.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback