Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2.53GHz 53 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 18.8 2-Core 17.3 27% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 18.6 8-Core 19.9 3% 19.2 Pts	64-Core 19.3 1% 19.3 Pts
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.49 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 1.7 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 21 20 27 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.59% Terrible	Read 8 Write 7.1 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 21.5 12% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.59% Great: 31%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 10.8 Write 5.5 Mixed 2 6% 6.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 256 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	9.52% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	11x
Pentium D 3.40GHzIntelBench 32%, 3,806 samples	7x
Pentium D 3.20GHzIntel $100Bench 31%, 938 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 6200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,060 samples	4x
Radeon X1300AMDBench 0%, 685 samples	3x
GeForce 7600 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,208 samples	3x