bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 21:31
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.8% Good
Memory 63.4
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 171
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 332
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 140GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 28 36 37 34 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 313
Write 97.8
Mixed 291
SusWrite 34.5
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 17.1
72% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 238
179% 239 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 82%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
523GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 33 33 24 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 194
Write 40.8
Mixed 292
SusWrite 31.8
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 14
57% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 241
178% 237 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
186GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 23 16 16 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 328
Write 222
Mixed 302
SusWrite 20.3
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 14.5
63% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 233
176% 237 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x16GB
3 of 64 slots used
48GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback