QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime25.6 Days
Run DateDec 07 '16 at 00:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 419
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.7
17% 19.2 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.3
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 256GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 513
Write 467
Mixed 497
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 72.7
75% 122 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 76%
Red Hat VirtIO 100GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 416
Write 212
Mixed 292
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 21
80% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 65.2
69% 114 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback