Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 187 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 345 45% 339 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 9% EVGA(3842 1180) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 2.53 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 195 131 133 131 181 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 382 Write 116 Mixed 246 SusWrite 163 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 13.7 80% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 23 43% 86 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 74%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100 3,609 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 53 51 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 152 Write 152 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 51.6 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 87%
Msft Virtual Disk 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 26GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 50 52 52 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 163 Write 39 Mixed 73 SusWrite 51.6 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 13.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 12.2 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	5x
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 16,472 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $222