Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '16 at 14:57
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 159
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 490
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 56.6
49% 59.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 67
Splatting 56.8
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 238GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,042
Write 278
Mixed 452
128% 591 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 28.8
117% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 76.8
78% 126 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0002
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 87.7
Mixed 78.7
65% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.45
93% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
42GB free
Firmware: VT10
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 68.9
Mixed 59.7
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$76
36GB free
Firmware: SB2OC70P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 43.4
Mixed 32.9
29% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.19
52% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Maxtor 6V200E0 204GB
10GB free
Firmware: VA11
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 34.1
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.39
104% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.5% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 14.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback