MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '16 at 17:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 528
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115A) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.6909
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 15.5
16% 17 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 17
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun 850 PRO 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 472
Mixed 501
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 30.5
149% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 200
186% 288 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Samsun 850 EVO M.2 1TB
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 391
Mixed 407
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 46
167% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 133
145% 245 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback