Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 837
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Lighting 80.8
Reflection 81.6
Parallax 73.5
66% 78.6 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 64.8
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1321 1185 823 824 827 825 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1381
Write 1,164
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 968
259% 1,155 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 98.6
329% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,558
DQ Write 1396
DQ Mixed 1,457
1,098% 1,470 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 282%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
103GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 318 318 318 317 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 489
Mixed 465
SusWrite 341
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60.4
208% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
109GB free
Firmware: DC8110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 419 417 418 418 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 409
Mixed 306
SusWrite 417
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 37.1
135% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 173
161% 250 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 101%
Micron_M550_2.5"_7mm_256GB 256GB
77GB free
Firmware: DL04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 389 290 216 258 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 444
Mixed 318
SusWrite 305
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 44.4
156% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 234
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
640gb High IOPS MLC Adapter for IBM System x 640GB
121GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 405 405 403 369 403 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 400
Mixed 363
SusWrite 398
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60
214% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 192
186% 288 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
252GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 79 79 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 108
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 79.4
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 26.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 30.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback