MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 03:29
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 768
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 901 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 8.84
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 8.13
6% 7.35 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 306 300 306 305 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,238
Write 1,465
Mixed 1151
SusWrite 333
287% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 76.3
261% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 605
DQ Mixed 849
613% 799 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 225%
Great: 280%
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
335GB free
Firmware: P0801C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 762 350 77 75 85 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 107%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 999GB
802GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
Read 231
Write 26.5
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 11.8
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 104%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1TB
792GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 13 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
Read 146
Write 25.5
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 13.1
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2800 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 2800 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 39.8
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 22.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback