HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory21.4 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 12:13
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 146
55% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 556
50% 422 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.22
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 17
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 255
Write 169
Mixed 176
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 17.7
90% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 39.4
61% 117 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 54%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
45GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 146
Write 107
Mixed 109
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.19
86% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 107%
Wd2502ab YS-23B7A0 39M 250GB
7GB free
Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 71
Write 68.2
Mixed 64.7
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.31
92% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273CH0-YH9 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback