Today's hottest deals

Biostar B360M D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar B360M D2V  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 14:52
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 495
65% 489 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 70
Parallax 59.6
55% 65.8 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 68.9
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 750GB
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2 2 2 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.13% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 9.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 2.1
6% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.5
438% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 41%
Ccboot iSCSI 480GB
71GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 9.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 3.6
6% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.9
483% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 32%
Ccboot iSCSI 512GB
141GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 10.3
Write 9
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 3.6
6% 8.17 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.4
394% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M D2V Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar B360M D2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 129% - Outstanding Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback