PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190706 |
Uptime | 4.9 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '20 at 02:08 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon R9 370
XFX(1682 2016) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.3
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 110 121 137 118 112 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Asgard AN256NVMe-M.2/80 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: S0318A0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1037 1071 1068 129 108 112 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
565GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 156 153 163 164 164 MB/s
|
91.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
800GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 137 138 137 137 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
584GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 88 89 89 89 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 766x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 297x |
Core i5-2400Intel $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 291x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 644x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 371x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $94 |