Today's hottest deals

Asus EB1033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus EB1033  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK EB1033
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 14:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D2700-$96
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 52.4
1-Core 9.2
2-Core 17.1
22% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 29.9
8-Core 30.5
4% 30.2 Pts
64-Core 29.5
2% 29.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M
Asus(1043 8536) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 2.12
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 85 90 93 89 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 207
Write 121
Mixed 148
SusWrite 92.4
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 18.1
60% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 91.2
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 78.3
59% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EB1033 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus EB1033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback