Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 85.3
49% 74 Pts
4-Core 83.5
8-Core 76.1
11% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 83.6
5% 83.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 6.62
Parallax 6.03
6% 6.5 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 5.17
4% 5.44 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 44 51 52 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 86.3
Write 87.8
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 46.2
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback