Alienware D900T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware D900T  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO D900T
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 01:35
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.60GHz
WMT478/NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 38.6
29% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 37.6
5% 38.2 Pts
64-Core 39.8
2% 39.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6800
Clevo(1558 0900) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.03
1% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS726060M9AT00 60GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 12 8.9 8.1 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 35.7
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 12.6
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 20%
Hitachi HTS726060M9AT00 60GB
51GB free
Firmware: MH4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 14 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 28.4
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 14.8
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback