HP EliteDesk 800 G1 DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1825
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 08:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 163
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 232
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1825) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 4.22
3% 4.19 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-128G-100 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 233 228 225 210 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 405
Write 300
Mixed 191
SusWrite 226
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 32
113% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 140
144% 236 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 DM Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $43
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback