Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 13:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 94.5
49% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 95.3
13% 95 Pts
64-Core 95
6% 95 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 82 39 65 102 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 240
Write 86.6
Mixed 183
SusWrite 84.1
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 18
66% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 106
83% 113 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 88%
Disk drive 160GB
66GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 92 94 93 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 95.2
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 92
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA78LMT-US2H Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback