Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 91.9
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 120
59% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 200
19% 160 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sanyo(144D C07F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 183 138 197 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 217
Write 189
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 169
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 8
31% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 13.3
12% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 54%
Lacie P9220 250GB
156GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 24 24 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.1% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 23
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 24.9
18% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback