Hp-pavilion KJ385AA-ABA a6433w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KJ385AA-ABA a6433w  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 05:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 48.5
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 45
26% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 45.2
8-Core 44.9
6% 45.1 Pts
64-Core 45.3
3% 45.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3000NM0033-9ZM178 802GB
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 124 131 138 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 113
Write 99.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 125
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KJ385AA-ABA a6433w Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KJ385AA-ABA a6433w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback