Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Memory 24.7 1-Core 13.1 2-Core 32.8 15% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 61.6 8-Core 55.3 8% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 55 3% 55 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.46 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.65 2% 1.92 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.5% Poor	Read 156 Write 94.9 Mixed 117 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 3.71 28% 9.15 MB/s	DQ Read 9.84 DQ Write 14.8 DQ Mixed 3.61 5% 9.41 MB/s

Generic USDU1 SD Card 32GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 30GB free Firmware: 2.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 80.5 Write 17.1 Mixed 38.7 34% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.82 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.96 370% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 288 14% 288 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom x5-Z8350IntelBench 21%, 9,056 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 16,763 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x