Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 11:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$139
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 290
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 949
90% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,451
90% 1,451 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 499GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 195 196 199 179 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 742
Write 377
Mixed 483
SusWrite 203
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 32.1
115% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 144
150% 238 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 288%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EARX-008 2TB
359GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 79 86 82 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 83.1
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EARS-00Y 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 47 52 50 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 82
Write 79.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 50.5
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 35.8
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $217

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback