Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 03:31
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 560
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 282B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 37.2
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 32.9
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,395
Write 6,646
Mixed 5,536
1,384% 6,192 MB/s
4K Read 504
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 353
1,367% 381 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 997
763% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
583GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 69 69 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 65.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 66.6
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%
WDC WD40 03FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 233
Mixed 126
SusWrite 177
253% 191 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1.5
389% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 5
DQ Mixed 2
241% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 178 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 173
Write 150
Mixed 95
SusWrite 178
199% 149 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
115% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 151
Write 150
Mixed 130
SusWrite 1.8
139% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
185% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 70%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 161
Write 159
Mixed 116
SusWrite 12.9
142% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$118
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $887
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback