Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime13 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 16:31
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 223
87% 150 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 638
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.5% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 67.9
65% 75.6 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 75.9
61% 73.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE220S 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1226A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 734 878 828 554 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2506
Write 962
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 688
290% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 90.5
310% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 477
486% 779 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 280%
Great: 279%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
99GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 425 458 447 455 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 436
Mixed 390
SusWrite 437
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 54.6
192% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 161
129% 187 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
394GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 413 416 413 407 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,134
Write 1,205
Mixed 1,156
SusWrite 416
220% 978 MB/s
4K Read 101
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 76.9
295% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 218
166% 224 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 171%
Great: 171%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 292
Write 12.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 27.1
64% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 29.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $738
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $274WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback