bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory28.7 GB free of 36 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 22:37
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 777
74% 611 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 1780 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 37
24% 33 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 32.3
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 510GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 548 448 521 444 471 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 483GB
198GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 17 16 18 16 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 19.4
57% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 36GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 61
MC Write 71.1
MC Mixed 69
192% 67 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 25.9
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback