Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 12:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 82
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 422
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 6.62
6% 22.8 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 14.5
8% 9.04 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.87
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 45.9
44% 51.8 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 48
Splatting 49.1
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 528 451 399 399 409 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 915
Mixed 911
SusWrite 485
179% 796 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 35.9
123% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 421
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 598
444% 577 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 181%
FD Fantom 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 40.4
29% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback