Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.8 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 06:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 73.4
43% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 71
8-Core 78.6
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 193GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 169 100 412 169 504 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 497
Write 372
Mixed 600
SusWrite 241
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
7% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 18.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback