Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory122 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181011
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 54.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
71% 135 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 650
62% 515 Pts
64-Core 2,407
149% 2,407 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0784) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.1% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 52.1
Parallax 67.7
34% 53.9 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 50
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 163 160 138 146 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 164
Mixed 128
SusWrite 152
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-UH 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 40.3
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback