Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 16:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 88.4
51% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 93.3
8-Core 85.6
12% 89.4 Pts
64-Core 93.2
6% 93.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.97
4% 4.42 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 43 52 54 58 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 149
Write 54.2
Mixed 127
SusWrite 55.3
21% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 8.8
63% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 15.9
22% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
209GB free
Firmware: ES13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 76 77 78 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 78
Write 76.7
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 77
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A 99U5471-012.A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback