Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2939-A1
Memory88.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140404
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 09:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 172
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 671
61% 510 Pts
64-Core 1,750
108% 1,750 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 959GB
658GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 68 102 37 50 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.2% Poor
Read 11.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 59.5
24% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 2.4
504% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 186%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 12x8GB
12 of 24 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.6% Good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback