Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 12:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 171
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 259
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 26 17 8.2 7.6 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 92.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 14.3
8% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 0.5
DQ Mixed 0.2
2% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 38%
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 1TB
123GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 33 33 44 35 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 69.5
Write 2.8
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 32.2
8% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 5.1
18% 6.3 MB/s
DQ Read 10.1
DQ Write 0.2
DQ Mixed 0.6
2% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback