Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 219
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 452
60% 450 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 18.1
12% 15.3 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 18.5
12% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 180 182 182 181 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67% Good
Read 337
Write 259
Mixed 271
SusWrite 186
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 32.4
113% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 177
130% 166 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67%
Great: 81%
Lacie P9220 1.5TB
287GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 31.1
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 36.6
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
12GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 71 70 71 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 68.3
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 70.2
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 77%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 7.5 7 7.5 7.8 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Read 9
Write 3.8
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 6.7
9% 7.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-020.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback