Hp-pavilion WK687AA-UUZ 600-1160ch

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion WK687AA-UUZ 600-1160ch  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON E66
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 08:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 115
48% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 149
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 903B) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.17.11.9819
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.16
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.56 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 108 109 87 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 97.7
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE8 M471B5673EH1-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback