Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 474 48% 389 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2980) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.4% Good	Lighting 76.1 Reflection 80.7 Parallax 78.2 62% 78.4 fps	MRender 78.2 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 64 57% 70.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 950GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 91 89 101 106 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 147 Write 136 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 93.9 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.1 188% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 182%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-PB Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 HMT325U7EFR8C-PB Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 HMT325U7CFR8C-PB HMT325U7CFR8C-PB Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 ... 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 32.3 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	500x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373