Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BMU-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 32.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
62% 123 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 656
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 54.5
49% 59.3 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 64.3
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,930
Write 25.2
Mixed 23.5
137% 660 MB/s
4K Read 386
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.6
588% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 147%
Mushkin MKNSSDSR1TB 1TB
265GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 384
Mixed 336
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 0.9
62% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.7
19% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 106 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 81.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 105
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 130% - Outstanding Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback