Asus M4N68T-M-LE-V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M-LE-V2  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 10:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 280
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 105
51% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 105
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
MSI(1462 2503) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 5.75
6% 6.31 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 5
4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 55 83 83 78 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 93.1
Write 103
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 75.8
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD400LD 400GB
369GB free
Firmware: WQ100-14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 27.4
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 27.9
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 40%
ClvrStuf USB Flash Drive 1GB
1GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 10
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 12.5
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M-LE-V2 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M-LE-V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback