PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20091216 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 01 '20 at 16:55 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon X1600
Asus(1043 0130) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
|
0.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 200 201 198 146 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
592GB free
Firmware: M440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 40 41 41 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
758GB free
Firmware: M440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $40Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 205x |
Core i7 860Intel $200Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 166x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 43x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 34x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $65 |