Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory5.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 138
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1600
Asus(1043 0130) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.53
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 200 201 198 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.8% Above average
Read 222
Write 220
Mixed 155
SusWrite 186
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 26.1
99% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 114
105% 161 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
592GB free
Firmware: M440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 114
Write 38
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 40.3
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 141
Write 40.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 41.6
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
758GB free
Firmware: M440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 104
Write 36.7
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 38.2
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback