PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 7910 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 7910 (all builds) |
Memory | 122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190924 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 06 '20 at 20:57 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
22.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 23 17 18 26 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.6 MB/s
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
120%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 59x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 103x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 71x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,400Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |