Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110624
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '20 at 13:19
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 159
51% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 311
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 03CA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.06
1% 1.38 fps
MRender 0.67
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
raid1 1TB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.3 7.8 8.2 8.7 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 78.5
Write 32.3
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 8.2
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 128%
DENTEQ 1TB
76GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 47 50 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 4.8
Write 21.3
Mixed 40
SusWrite 44.8
21% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WILK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback