Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '17 at 20:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 201
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 521
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.2101.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 36.4
25% 31.5 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 32.3
23% 27.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256F 251GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM8JA1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 99%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
820GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 82.4
Write 91.4
Mixed 78.8
110% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.21
65% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x45424A3430454738424657422D4A532D4620 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 28.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback