Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory3.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 20:46
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 308
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 13.7
12% 14.2 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 15.5
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 207
Write 174
Mixed 145
SusWrite 102
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 18.1
64% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 47.5
DQ Mixed 22.7
21% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 76%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
42GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 150 138 138 137 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 227
Write 206
Mixed 188
SusWrite 147
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 30.8
105% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 45.9
38% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 108%
ASMT1053 500GB
172GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 18.3
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 33%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$67
721GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
116GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 25.7
Write 36.8
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 53.5
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 36%
ipTIME External 500GB
302GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Read 16
Write 14
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 15
21% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 imation 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback