Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator G3-571

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G3-571  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMar 18 '20 at 00:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 146
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 437
45% 361 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 65
Parallax 6.06
6% 26 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 13.7
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 33 34 35 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 37 38 39 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 97.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 39.3
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 94%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 33 27 32 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 110
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 32.3
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.5% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-571 Builds (Compare 1,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Acer Predator G3-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback