Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 05:21
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 150
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 228
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1079 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 45.6
31% 39.3 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 38.9
28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 62 65 76 128 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 280
Write 220
Mixed 236
SusWrite 100
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 24.3
83% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 56.9
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 55.6
62% 100 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
591GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 150 151 150 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 127
Write 127
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 150
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-4G F3-17000CL11- F3-2400C11-4G F3-17000CL11- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 16.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback