HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8309
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 58.9 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 143 54% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 447 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 6,488 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 840E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.2% Average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 61.7 Parallax 64.8 38% 57.7 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 52 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB70H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,156 Write 667 Mixed 464 167% 762 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 37.2 125% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 520 DQ Write 378 DQ Mixed 531 375% 476 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 657GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 141 144 140 138 147 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 150 Write 135 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 140 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 11.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 5.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	512x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	219x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	324x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	231x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	141x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	86x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	70x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	202x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	135x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16