Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 15:00
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU-1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 0 GHz, turbo 0 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 127
2-Core 261
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 737
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 885
59% 885 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$415
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 315
Reflection 267
Parallax 256
83% 279 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 312
Splatting 240
84% 252 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 53 371 51 54 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,320
Write 896
Mixed 855
SusWrite 104
176% 794 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 76.7
267% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 73.2
163% 328 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 162%
Great: 234%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$130
630GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 298 286 292 297 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 347
Mixed 316
SusWrite 294
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 47
163% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 244
182% 242 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 123%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
380GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 94.5
Write 98
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 57.8
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
554GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 143 145 144 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 141
Write 132
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 143
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$46
353GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 67.2
Write 75
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 73.9
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 137 137 135 136 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 10.3
Write 36.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 136
37% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
56% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 133%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 32,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,533
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback