Clevo P150HMx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemClevo P150HMx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P150HMx
Memory13.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 22:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2920XM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 408
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M
Clevo(1558 5102) 2GB
CLim: 575 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 8.59
0% 8.18 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 14.7
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
642GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 79 81 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 81.8
Write 66.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 75.3
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
280GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 85.3
Write 86.6
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 82.9
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown.B300G.C130C Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 76.B300G.C130C Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P150HMx Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P150HMx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback