Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario RN653AA-ABA SR2177CL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory	3.4 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20061215
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration	439 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 218 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 43.4 1-Core 36.6 2-Core 69.1 31% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 69 8-Core 68.9 9% 68.9 Pts	64-Core 60.3 4% 60.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0915) 1GB CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 350.12 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.12 2% 1.98 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 1.78 2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 55 54 38 62 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 92.3 Write 88 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 51 51% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+AMDBench 44%, 870 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x